Yael
                Wieselberg 
                Maharal, somewhat unusual amongst Jewish
                thinkers for his explicit interest in the field of Jewish
                education, has much to say about the primary importance of
                pedagogy. Throughout his writings, and Netivot Olam in
                particular, he explains that fear of heaven, rather than
                intellectualism, is the key to a genuine relationship with the
                heavenly realm. Famous for his rejection of abstract pilpul,
                Maharal suggests a paradigm for a very different kind of
                learning, based upon the values of Yirat Shamayim (fear
                of heaven) and Anavah (humility). Unlike
                contemporary academic dogma, Maharal argues that while Chochmah
                (wisdom) remains valuable where it leads to spirituality, it
                loses meaning the moment it disconnects from Yirat Shamayim.
                Teaching cannot therefore be circumscribed to fact or
                methodology; it needs the direction of Dveykut B'ashem,
                guiding the student towards a personal relationship with God. 
                Maharal posits a clear division between Chochmah,
                a term to be defined here as intellectual wisdom, and Torah. The
                distinction is between empiricist, this-worldly wisdom, and the
                enterprise of Torah, that which brings mankind to their ultimate
                tachlit (purpose) in the world to come. The first form of
                learning explains Maharal, remains solipsistic, concerned with
                factual knowledge that keeps man bound in his self-contained,
                earthly existence. And while there is value in the Chochmah
                Kllalit (general wisdom) that is able to provide insights
                into the nature and order of reality, secular, illusory wisdom
                remains unable to advance the Torah enterprise. Torah, on the
                other hand, with its unique teleology, constitutes the 'Lashon
                Hora'ah' (language of teaching) insofar as it 'shows' man
                the possibilities of another realm of existence. The language of
                pedagogy is at root, concerned with connecting the physical and
                the supernatural, an aspiration generated through yirah
                and anavah. 
                Illustrating the model, Maharal writes of an
                approach to Torah-learning founded upon a hierarchy of values:
                those of wisdom (chochmah), awe (yirah),
                and humility (anavah). For Maharal,
                wisdom appears as only the first rung on the value-scale,
                ascending towards yirah and peaking with anavah,
                the humble recognition of one's place in the world that aligns
                man with God. In different ways, fear of heaven and the pursuit
                of humility both contribute towards building the I-Thou
                relationship. Each express more Divine truth than barren
                intellectualism, viewed by Maharal as a limited, this-worldly
                phenomenon. Instead, he identifies anavah with dveykut,
                the bond with God that is the focus and purpose of all
                existence. The moment of humility in which we recognize our
                relationship with God also brings us to Him. And partly because
                it is informed by dveykut, Maharal's perspective on the
                Jewish value system is almost entirely governed by the
                principles of relationship. Beginning with the fundamental
                inter-relation of concepts, Maharal ultimately celebrates the
                union of man and God, the Torah, and the Jewish people. Behind
                each of these relationships is the dveykut paradigm, so
                that understanding its assumptions aids the education of both
                religiosity and reciprocity. Learning to view oneself in
                relation to the 'other', recognizing that one stands in eternal
                dialogue with God, other people, or the text, establishes a
                contextual framework that is built upon relationship. For
                Maharal, this awareness is central to the development of dveykut,
                the ultimate in moral development. 
                 
                  |